Settled Claims

Below are some examples of specific claims that First Nations in Saskatchewan have made and settled with the government. 

These are just a few examples and not a complete list. For information about all settled and ongoing specific claims go to the Reporting Centre on Specific Claims website.

Treaty Land Entitilement

Some First Nations in Saskatchewan have now purchased land to make up for the shortfall based on Treaty entitlements. Other claims are still in the process. These include George Gordon First Nation, Muskoday First Nation and Pasqua First Nation. 

All of the numbered Treaties include the promise to set aside land for the exclusive use of the First Nation. This is called reserve land. The size of reserve land was based on a First Nation's population at the time the Treaty was signed. There was an amount per member promised that differed between Treaties. However, some First Nations did not receive the amount of reserve land they were promised and $440 million was set aside to compensate these First Nations.

First Nations that did not receive the reserve land promised can file a claim with the government through the specific claims process. The government has made agreements with some First Nations that made claims. Under these agreements First Nations received money to buy land from the government or private owners. The purchased land is then owned by the First Nation. But it does not become reserve land until the First Nation goes through a lengthy and expensive process that includes environmental assessments and land surveys.

Treaty Agricultural Benefits Claims

Agricultural benefits were promised in the Treaties. Historical evidence shows that these promises were not fulfilled. This limited the ability of First Nations to grow, and develop their economies, and become equal partners in the economy of the day which at the time was agriculture. First Nations have made specific claims based on this. 14 First Nations in Saskatchewan reached an agreement with the government for $1.72 billion to settle their agricultural benefits claims. 

Annuities and Salaries

Beardy’s and Okemasis Cree Nation made a specific claim based on a Treaty promise to pay annuities as well as Chief and Headmen salaries that were not paid. Following the Riel Resistance, the government wrongly designated Beardy’s and Okemasis First Nations as disloyal because of their alleged participation in the Resistance. To punish them, every member was denied their annuity payments from 1885 to 1888. The Specific Claims Tribunal found that there was no evidence to support a finding that they were in fact disloyal.

There is no evidence that the presence of the rebel forces at the Beardy's and Okemasis reserve at Duck Lake was due to anything but a coincidence of location. Chiefs Beardy and Okemasis were not disloyal. The members of the band were not disloyal. Some joined the rebels in the battles. There is no evidence that these few were aligned politically with Riel or ideologically motivated.

Beary's & Okemasis Band #96 and #97 v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

The claim was settled with the government. Under the agreement the First Nation was given $4 million in compensation. 

Punishment for First Nations Labelled Disloyal

First Nations branded as disloyal  following the Riel Resistance faced a number of punishments in addition to the withholding of annuities:

  • abolishing Tribal systems of government
  • confiscation of medals
  • seizing guns
  • strictly enforcing a pass system which confined members to the reserve unless given a pass by the Indian Agent
How helpful was this article?
Department of Justice Canada

PLEA gratefully acknowledges funding from the Department of Justice Canada for the development and printing of this resource.

Cree Nisga'a Clothing

The beautiful original artwork in this resource was created by Cree artist Linda Lavallee, owner of Cree Nisga’a Clothing.